The components of an innovation strategy can include the following:
Goals:
These are the general outcomes that the company is trying to achieve.
These can represent the mission or vision statements that define what
the company stands for and what it is trying to achieve. These need to
be simple and clear so that staff within the company can understand the
direction that the firm is trying to take so they can align their
efforts to this.
Arena:
This defines the general parameters of the environment in which the
company intends to compete. The purpose of this section is to define the
scope of the strategy. The arena covers a number of areas and should
not simply be viewed as defining a market in which to compete. Other
aspects that need to be considered is the technology and product
positioning relative to competitors (e.g. low cost or high
differential). The arena needs to be broad enough to ensure that there
is sufficient space to grow but narrow enough to ensure effort is not
dissipated too broadly.
Mechanism:The
mechanism defines how the company will approach innovation relative to
competitoors in the market. The standard mechanisms (made famous by
Miles & Snow) can include:
- Propector: These firms aim to become the first mover with new products and services and attempt to use first in the market as a means to secure an advantageous position in the market.
- Analyzer: These are also known as the fast followers. They don't attempt to be first to market but instead attempt to follow quickly when trends are identified. They take the approach second but better and can capitalize on the mistakes of the prospectors.
- Defender: These can include companies which already have a sizable market share and are aiming to retain a stable niche in the market. Generally these companies look to grow through innovations in efficiency rather than new products.
Platform:
Many innovations may be built on a platform. An example of this
is Boeing's airframes that can be used for everything from carry
presidents to carrying mail. There are very few companies don't utilize
some form of common basis for their competition. Boeing is an extreme
example, but consulting firms rely on the expertise of their staff,
telcos generally build their business around their networks and
investment in switching infrastructure. A platform centric approach
builds a solid foundation product or service to which new developments
can be added quickly. This has the bonus of low cost, high speed
development as well as leveraging any branding value with the basic
platform. The disadvantage is that a strong platform can be restricting
or dangerous if the platform looks like it will be succeeded by new
technology.
Collectively these elements give the firm a good understanding of where it will compete, how it will compete, and what will form the basic reusable components within their innovation strategy.